Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Journal of Biological Regulators and Homeostatic Agents ; 36(Supplement 3):381-397, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2125439

ABSTRACT

Aim: This retrospective research was aimed to evaluate the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on orthodontic emergencies and Patients' perceptions of orthodontic patients. Material(s) and Method(s): A total of 204 patients were gathered who were not seen for nearly 5 months from the first of March 2020 to the end of July 2020 due to dental clinic closure. The mean age of the samples was 20.2 (SD = 12.5) years consisting of 134 females (66%) and 70 males (34%). All patients had undergone active orthodontic treatment with fixed and removable appliances before the pandemic. The survey included demographics, types of orthodontic emergencies, and Patients' perceptions of orthodontic treatment during the closure of the dental clinic. Continuous variables were analyzed by mean and standard deviation, while categorical variables were analyzed by frequency and percentage. Result(s): In general, 46.5% of the patients suffered from various emergencies. The incidence of emergencies was approximately 3 times higher than that of the normal appointment times. Debonding and poking wire had the most frequently reported classification respectively (14.2%) (7.9%). 30.4% of patients stated that pandemic had a significant impact on the efficacy of orthodontic treatment. Conclusion(s): This study showed that the COVID-19 pandemic had a negative impact on patient care due to a higher number of emergencies and in turns, it delayed the therapeutic progress of patients. 16% of patients with active orthodontic appliances did not continue their treatment due to pandemics. More than half of the patients were willing to be seen every 8 weeks. Copyright © by BIOLIFE, s.a.s.

2.
Koomesh ; 24(4):421-433, 2022.
Article in Persian | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2003302

ABSTRACT

The sense of smell, one of the five basic senses that humans have, helps us detect different types of odors. It also plays an important role in the detection of pollutants, toxic gases, or rotten and hazardous foods. Although olfaction is considered less important than the other senses, smell disorders could cause a variety of problems, including reduced taste detection due to the relationship between taste and smell, depression, and overall loss of quality of life. Olfactory dysfunction is one of the first clinical signs of neurological diseases such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease. The olfactory disorder has many etiologies, some of which are more obvious. Most people with olfactory disorders have experienced a recent illness or trauma. Common causes of olfactory disorders include aging, rhinosinusitis, upper respiratory infections, and cerebral lesion;the rest of the cases are less relevant. Since there are limited evidence-based treatments for olfactory disorders, it is necessary to share information about the risks associated with these disorders. This information includes practical and useful screening measures for olfactory dysfunction, appropriate clinical evaluation, patient counseling to prevent injury, health and quality of life management, and the introduction of treatments with higher recovery rates. This review study focuses on the etiology, prevalence, and short-term and long-term consequences of olfactory disorders. Also, diagnostic strategies and new treatment options have been developed and discussed.

3.
J Laryngol Otol ; 135(5): 426-435, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1196805

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to measure the duration and recovery rate of olfactory loss in patients complaining of recent smell loss as their prominent symptom during the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak. METHOD: This was a prospective telephone follow-up observational study of 243 participants who completed an online survey that started on 12 March 2020. RESULTS: After a mean of 5.5 months from the loss of smell onset, 98.3 per cent of participants reported improvement with a 71.2 per cent complete recovery rate after a median of 21 days. The chance of complete recovery significantly decreased after 131 days from the onset of loss of smell (100 per cent sensitive and 97.7 per cent specific). Younger age and isolated smell loss were associated with a rapid recovery, whereas accompanying rhinological and gastrointestinal symptoms were associated with longer loss of smell duration. CONCLUSION: Smell loss, occurring as a prominent symptom during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, showed a favourable outcome. However, after 5.5 months from the onset, around 10 per cent of participants still complained of moderate or severe hyposmia.


Subject(s)
Anosmia/diagnosis , COVID-19/complications , Olfaction Disorders/etiology , Adult , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/virology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Iran/epidemiology , Olfaction Disorders/diagnosis , Pandemics , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Recovery of Function/physiology , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL